Why are second and third triennial year readings identical for Nitzavim?
Why are the second and third triennial year readings identical for Nitzavim?
They are identical to the full kriyah.
The first triennial year also seems almost identical:
https://www.hebcal.com/sedrot/nitzavim
This doesn't feel very "triennial" to me at all.
Answer
Hi, thanks for using Hebcal!
The triennial readings on Hebcal.com come from A Complete Triennial System for Reading the Torah by the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly.
On page 418 of the document, Rabbi Eisenberg writes:
נצבים-וילך are read separately about as often as they are combined. Because each Sidrah is brief (Nitzavim is only 40 verses, Vayelech 30 verses), I recommend reading both in their entirety when they appear separately.
Due to my reluctance to divide Deuteronomy 29:15-28 (which would necessitate ending on a negative note) there is some overlapping in year II (30:1-14). Similarly, in year III, 31:22 is repeated in order to avoid dividing 31:14-19, while allowing for seven aliyot.
Customer support service by UserEcho
Hi, thanks for using Hebcal!
The triennial readings on Hebcal.com come from A Complete Triennial System for Reading the Torah by the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly.
On page 418 of the document, Rabbi Eisenberg writes:
נצבים-וילך are read separately about as often as they are combined. Because each Sidrah is brief (Nitzavim is only 40 verses, Vayelech 30 verses), I recommend reading both in their entirety when they appear separately.
Due to my reluctance to divide Deuteronomy 29:15-28 (which would necessitate ending on a negative note) there is some overlapping in year II (30:1-14). Similarly, in year III, 31:22 is repeated in order to avoid dividing 31:14-19, while allowing for seven aliyot.