0
Fixed

Is third Triennial for Chukat inaccurate? Chamishi and Shishi both have 21:25

Rabbi Jonathan Klein 3 months ago updated 3 months ago 3

It looks like Numbers 21:25 is listed twice in the triennial cycle; is this a mistake?  I think so.  Please advise.

Answer

+1
Answer
Fixed

Confirmed that this indeed was an error in the original 1988 CJLS triennial reading document. We've published the corrected reading on the hebcal.com website.

+1
Answer
Fixed

Confirmed that this indeed was an error in the original 1988 CJLS triennial reading document. We've published the corrected reading on the hebcal.com website.

+1
Started

Hebcal Torah readings come directly from A Complete Triennial System for Reading the Torah, published by the Committee on Jewish Law and Standards of the Rabbinical Assembly.


It appeared to be intentional (highlighting mine):



However, Rabbi Miles B Cohen's luach 5782 (page 189) appears to differ:

We'll take another look at the CJLS decision of Nov. 16, 2020 and see if the readings need to be revised.